The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could set limits on the federal government's sweeping powers to seize property in drug cases under "criminal forfeiture" laws. Tony and Terry Honeycutt were charged with federal drug offenses after selling quantities of iodine-based water disinfectant at their camping and hunting store in Chattanooga—because the substance can also be used in the manufacture of methamphetamine. Tony, the actual owner of the store, pleaded guilty, and had $200,000 seized—the amount believed equivalent to his proceeds from the sales of the chemical. Terry fought the charge, and lost. The government then sought an additional $70,000 from him. In Honeycutt v. United States, Terry is arguing that he is not liable for the proceeds because he wasn't an owner of the store.
Recent comments
1 week 1 day ago
2 weeks 5 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
15 weeks 1 day ago
20 weeks 6 days ago
31 weeks 6 days ago
32 weeks 5 days ago
34 weeks 2 days ago
34 weeks 6 days ago
35 weeks 1 day ago