Crack cocaine sentencing reform takes effect

Posted on November 2nd, 2011 by Global Ganja Report and tagged , , , , .

cocaineThis week, more than 12,000 people—85% of them Black—now serving time for crack cocaine offenses will have their sentences reviewed by a federal judge under terms of the Fair Sentencing Act, passed in August of last year. The reform bill reduced the 100-to-1 disparity between minimum sentences for crack and powder cocaine to 18-to-1. On Nov. 1, those already serving time became eligible for a hearing to consider reducing their sentences under the new changes.

Under the former system, five grams of crack resulted in five years of prison, while it took 500 grams of powder cocaine to get the same time in prison. The ACLU's blog called the changes that took effect this week "a huge victory in reducing racial disparities and restoring confidence in the criminal justice system."

The US Sentencing Commission determined the new guidelines should apply retroactively. But rights activists say more needs to be done. "This is an incremental step in trying to address the disparity, but we think the only fair way to treat these two drugs is to treat them and punish them in the same manner," the ACLU's Jesselyn McCurdy told NPR. (Color Lines, Daily News, Nov. 2)

Photo by In a NY State of Mind

 

 

Comments

High court expands application of Fair Sentencing Act

Global Ganja Report's picture

The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on June 21 that the Fair Sentencing Act (FSA), which reduces minimum sentences for crack-cocaine convictions, applies to defendants who were sentenced after the act was in place, even if they were arrested before the act took effect. In the combined cases of Dorsey v. United States and Hill v. United States, the court considered which sentencing guidelines should be applied.

In Dorsey, the defendant was arrested in possession of 5.5 grams of crack cocaine and was convicted. During the intervening time, the FSA was passed, which raised the amount of crack cocaine required for a five-year sentence from 5 to 28 grams. In his opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer concluded that "Congress intended the Fair Sentencing Act's new, lower mandatory minimums to apply to the post-Act sentencing of pre-Act offenders," and that the statute should be applied as Congress intended.

The FSA did not include any language to make it apply retroactively, but it not did explicitly deny such retroactivity either. Justice Antonin Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, finding that Congress must clearly repeal an old statute in order to eliminate its effect.

The court's decision overturns a decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upholding the defendants' original sentences based on the old sentencing guidelines. (Jurist, June 20)

 

Comment by Global Ganja Report on Jul 5th, 2012 at 6:51 pm

Obama under pressure on cocaine sentencing

Bill Weinberg's picture

 We don't quite get this. A piece on Slate July 29 called on Obama to commute the sentences of some 5,000 who remain imprisoned under the old cocaine sentencing guidelines—despite the ruling of the Sentencing Commission that the new guidelines should be applied retroactively. The US Courts website in June 2011  said that the new guidelines "could make 12,000 federal offenders eligible to seek a reduction in their prison sentence." So, were 7,000 freed over the past two years? The reporting on this has been grossly insufficient...

Comment by Bill Weinberg on Aug 1st, 2013 at 5:02 pm

Recent comments

Who's new

  • John Veit
  • YosephLeib
  • Peter Gorman
  • jpproject
  • garrick beck